Articles: Book Review
Title: The Open Secret: An Introduction to the Theology of Mission
Author: Lesslie Newbigin
Publisher: William B.
Eerdmans Publishing Company
Genre: Nonfiction
Year: 1995
ISBN: 978-0-8028-0829-5
PAGINATION:189
Introduction:
Lesslie
Newbigin, in his book, The Open Secret, calls for a rethinking of
missiology in the face of the changing global missional landscape. In this new
way of thinking about missions, Newbigin insists that the triune God is already
at work in the world and invites the church to participate. He insists that the mission is not a human enterprise. The church participates in God’s mission of
redeeming the cosmos. It is not proselytizing but bearing witness to what God
is doing in the world through Christ and the Holy Spirit. He calls for a
renewed understanding that is deeply theological, and framed around the
doctrine of the Trinity, election, and a humble engagement with the
multicultural realities of the world. In this review, I will explore Newbigin’s
key arguments concerning missions, the role of the church, the doctrine of
election, and the interaction between faith and culture, and offer my critical
evaluation of the ideas contained and how they have affected my understanding
of mission and ministry.
Key
Ideas
Newbigin
first explores the faulty foundations upon which the 19th-century missionary endeavours were based. He denounces the colonial embellishment and
cultural superiority that marked the missionary activities of that era, describing
them as unbiblical and unwholesome. He proposes that the gospel must draw from
its authority and not from another. He introduces the Trinitarian framework to the
understanding of missions, arguing that missions must be understood in light of a
sending God. God the Father sends the Son to establish His Kingdom with the
witness of God the Holy Spirit. The church, therefore, has no mission in the
world but the mission of God. This understanding corrects two common
misconceptions: first, that mission is primarily a human effort to spread
religious knowledge; and second, that mission can be reduced to social activism
when it is divorced from its theological foundations.
The
doctrine of election is another central theme. He illustrates this with God’s
choice of Israel for the rest of the world. Newbigin traces how God chose Abraham
as the seed of the new nation, then Isaac, and then Jacob. He contends that a
proper understanding of this doctrine will dispel notions of elitism in the
church. Understanding missions requires a realization that the church is not
chosen for itself and it is not "the privileged club". It is chosen
out of the world for the world. The key to the relation between the universal
and the particular is God's way of election. The one (or the few) is chosen for
the sake of the many; the particular is chosen for the sake of the
universal" (p68).
This approach calls for humility on the part
of the church. The church witnesses to the world from a position of weakness, not
strength. The church is a broken, frail, and sinful gathering of men acting on
God’s behalf to redeem the cosmos. Newbigin introduces the idea of the Kingdom
of God, insisting that this Kingdom is beyond the church. This reign of God is
wrapped in a mystery of contradictions. It is entrusted to those chosen by God
(the church) to proclaim to all nations of the world. They act out this reign
by proclamation and endurance, knowing that the reign of God has conquered the
powers of evil (p.39).
Newbigin
takes on Western secularism and how it has impacted the Christian mission. In
his analysis, modern Western culture has privatized religion, relegating it to
the realm of personal belief rather than public truth. This has led to a crisis
in mission, where the gospel is seen as just one among many competing
worldviews rather than the true revelation of God. He challenges the church to
reclaim its public witness, preach the gospel of the Kingdom, and engage
critically with cultural assumptions rather than passively accommodating them.
The
place of dialogue in missions is another big idea in The Open Secret.
Newbigin argues that although the church is the ground and pillar of truth, as
the scripture puts it, there is a need for the church to come down and meet
others at the foot of the cross. He denounces the exclusivist approaches that
dismiss other religions and the pluralist approaches that reduce all religions to
mere expressions of the same truth. He instead calls for humble confidence, in
which Christians bear witness to Christ while remaining open to learning from
others.
Critical
Engagement
Newbigin’s
approach to underpinning missions with the doctrine of the Trinity is more
profound than I have seen any other theologian do. It is a compelling
presentation. I realize that the church has been running on the wrong
theology. The implication is that we are
doing missions and God is supporting us by providing the resources and
empowerment. This situation has put ministers under stress, trying to do the
work. The church has been reduced to a program mill while trying to invent ways
of doing “her missions” instead of discerning what God is doing and how he may
want us to participate in it. It restores my peace to realize that this is
God’s mission and I am only privileged to participate in it. This restores a sense of awe and dependence on
God’s initiative rather than human ingenuity. This theological grounding
ensures that the mission is always centered on God rather than on the church’s
institutional goals.
His
discussion of the election is also thought-provoking. By reframing the election as
a call to service rather than a mark of exclusive privilege, Newbigin
challenges triumphalist understandings of Christian identity. This resonates
with biblical themes, particularly in the teachings of Jesus and Paul, who
emphasize that being chosen by God entails a vocation to serve and bless
others. just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to
serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Matt.20:28). Having
said that, I must now point out that by not devoting time to the discussion on the
relationship between divine election and human agency, he leaves room for
dangerous speculations He does not highlight how human responsibility interacts
with God’s sovereign initiative which I think would have further strengthened
his position and cleared possible confusion.
Newbigin
proposes an open and confident engagement with cultures across the world. With
the African context in mind, where the religious elements of culture are so overwhelming,
how that can be achieved without syncretism is very challenging. Can the church
bear witness without being perceived as intolerant? How can it engage without
compromising its distinctiveness? These are questions that require further
reflection and application.
There
are a few issues of discomfort for me. In Chapter 1, Newbigin talks about how
colonial affinity with the gospel has set missions on the wrong footing. I
expected him to use this platform to speak on reparation since social justice
is part of the church’s missional agenda. He simply scratches it and moves on. Again,
in Chapter 7, he talks about “…China, India and Africa, who at the same moment
are living, praying, suffering, and dying, outside of the realm of salvation
until they are ‘discovered,’ many centuries too late…” (p.72). And I ask, “Discovered
by whom?” I find those comments to be very unwholesome and inappropriate for the
kind of conversation he is engaged in. By using those, he has violated the
very ethos of humility he seeks to project.
Personal
Assessment
Newbigin,
through this masterpiece, has revolutionized my understanding of missions. With
reference to the notion of the Kingdom of God and how it relates to the church,
a whole new vista has opened for me. My prior understanding of the Kingdom had
been limited to the distant abode of God or the church. My focus has now shifted
from winning souls to fit them for heaven to renewing the whole cosmos for
God’s redemption.
His
views on the election have reshaped how I view the church’s role in society. In a
world where Christianity is often associated with power and influence,
Newbigin’s emphasis on servanthood challenges me to reframe mission as
sacrificial witness rather than institutional expansion. This perspective is
particularly relevant in post-Christendom contexts, where the church must learn
to live as a faithful minority rather than a dominant cultural force.
Conclusion
The
Open Secret is a vital contribution to contemporary
missiology. His Trinitarian framework, his redefinition of election, his
critique of secularism, and his vision for interfaith engagement all offer
important insights for the church. While
some aspects of his arguments could be further developed, particularly in
relation to practical applications of engaging culture and dialogue, his
overall thesis remains deeply compelling. This book has challenged me to think
more theologically about mission, to engage culture with greater confidence,
and to approach ministry with a renewed sense of dependence on God, discerning
what he is doing and how I may be a part of it. I strongly recommend The Open
Secret to all Christians who want to see the Kingdom of God established.
Comments
Post a Comment